
September 18, 2026
Defensive design with Codex: 3 keys to robust software
Defensive design, Codex, and artificial intelligence: discover how to create robust software by preventing invalid states and technical debt through design.

Defensive design, Codex, and artificial intelligence: discover how to create robust software by preventing invalid states and technical debt through design.

AI and education: does artificial intelligence help us learn, or is it taking away the mental effort we need to think? Discover the value of cognitive difficulty.

The problem is that a chatbot is designed precisely to reduce that discomfort. Ask it for an outline, and it gives you one. Ask it for examples, and it gives you those. Ask it for the entire essay, and it does that too. With a convincing tone, good structure, and sometimes perfectly disguised errors. That last point should make us pause before saying

My thesis is that Codex will make two kinds of teams more visible. Some will use AI to produce more screens and more code, only to discover later that they have also multiplied their inconsistencies. Others will use it to multiply the impact of a clearly defined intent: clear contracts, models that represent the business, tests

Conversational advertising in ChatGPT is already here: OpenAI is testing sponsored agents that can answer questions, recommend products, and guide you all the way to a purchase.

Did you know that “almost half” can be a misleading figure when we talk about artificial intelligence and electricity?

The easy interpretation is that tech companies should pay, and that settles it. I would say they should indeed bear the costs they create, but without turning that into an excuse to halt all necessary investment or ignore the fact that the grid already needs modernization. The opposing interpretation is that data centers bring growth

Artificial intelligence is driving a surge in electricity demand: will households end up paying for the expansion of data centers? We analyze the debate in the United States and its consequences.

What if “human control” over artificial intelligence were just a rubber stamp?

The big news about Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon sharing a stage is not that they have both put their differences behind them. It is that artificial intelligence is creating a new political axis: who controls the ability to decide, produce, surveil, and persuade at scale. This axis encompasses legitimate concerns

When it comes to artificial intelligence, Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon converge on a crucial question: who will control the technology that is transforming power, employment, and politics?

On AI safety, OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google DeepMind are beginning to coordinate as the race for advanced models enters a delicate phase.