Capital de TokensJust because something is legal does not mean it is safe
Watch on YouTube Some will say: “if the use is legal, a private company should not be able to veto the state”. That is a coherent position, but it has a catch. What is it? Legal does not automatically mean prudent, proportionate or socially acceptable. Mass surveillance may have a legal basis in certain circumstances and still pose
Some will say: “if the use is legal, a private company should not be able to veto the state”. That is a coherent position, but it has a catch. What is it? Legal does not automatically mean prudent, proportionate or socially acceptable. Mass surveillance may have a legal basis in certain circumstances and still pose an enormous problem for civil liberties. Something similar happens with autonomous weapons: the legality of an operation does not, by itself, answer who takes responsibility when a machine makes a mistake. Conversely, a company should not be able to present itself as the ultimate democratic arbiter of war either. Anthropic has commercial and reputational interests, and a philosophy of its own. Its limits deserve scrutiny; they are not a constitution written by engineers.
Full episode: https://youtu.be/BCjtygiYhzU
🤖 AI-generated content: the script, voices and images for this episode were produced using artificial intelligence tools.
#Shorts