October 1, 2026

Developers should not control the safety verdict

I want common standards for frontier artificial intelligence. It would be absurd to give up tools that can detect dangers before they reach millions of people. But I want those who build these systems to contribute evidence and expertise without controlling the verdict. If the proposed body comes

October 1, 2026

When AI stops answering and starts acting

Now a different idea is emerging: the agent. Instead of asking it for an answer, you assign it an outcome. For example: “Prepare a report on the changes to this project.” To do that, it may need to read messages, consult files, organize data, and draft the document. It can link steps together and use tools.

October 1, 2026

AI writes code in an hour… how long does it take us to review it?

And there is our thesis: the next competitive advantage may depend not on the best score in isolation, but on the ability to turn a promising answer into a completed, reviewed, and economically viable task. Does Google offer any clues about that? It says its own teams already use Argon. It gives examples

October 1, 2026

The risk of AI lies in the permissions we give it

Second: the risk that is easiest to overlook lies in the permissions we give today’s systems. An assistant drafting an email can make a mistake and leave an absurd sentence. An agent connected to email, a browser, a company’s code, and its accounts can turn an error into an action. The differ