Meta launched Muse Image, an AI that used photos from public Instagram accounts to generate images of real people without asking their permission. Within 72 hours, SAG-AFTRA asked its members to deactivate it, and Meta removed it completely.
SpaceX charges Anthropic $1.25 billion a month for the privilege of existing computationally. Today we're going to look at what's really happening, why this agreement has implications that go far beyond Musk's compliment, and where the real tension lies that almost no one is naming
I mean, basically, it's a perpetual surveillance device with very good marketing. That's a pretty extreme interpretation... Is it? Let's think about it this way: the main concern OpenAI has publicly acknowledged about its own product is how to handle the fact that it has microphones and cameras on all the time. No
Yes, but there's a structural problem that can't be solved simply by improving the model. The problem is the interface. The screen isn't just a way to visualize things: it's a form of control. When you see on-screen what your phone is doing, you can interrupt it, correct it, or change direction. If the device operates so
OpenAI is betting $6.4 billion on Jony Ive's «io» gadget: no screen, with an always-on microphone and camera. Liberation or covert surveillance?
In the artificial intelligence industry, compute is oxygen. Whoever controls it has the power of life or death over those who consume it. The second point—and this is where the story gets really interesting—is that Musk's praise is not an act of intellectual generosity. It is a strategic positioning move, and it should be read as such
The SpaceX contract includes a clause allowing it to reclaim computing resources if Anthropic's models do something that "harms humanity," based on criteria presumably decided by Musk himself. This isn't an agreement between equals. It's an infrastructure provider that can pull the plug on its customer if it decides the customer misbehaved. And that customer is currently the best in the world at artificial intelligence.
Elon Musk has just declared that Anthropic is the undisputed leader in artificial intelligence with its Fable and Mythos models. But there’s a catch: SpaceX charges it $1.25 billion a month for the computing power that makes them possible.
If Meta floods the market with cheap computing capacity, the price of compute will fall rapidly, affecting the entire cloud ecosystem. But that will greatly benefit startups and small developers, who will have much more affordable tools for creating artificial intelligence applications. Yes
Imagine you have an execution AI—the one that browses, interacts with the web, and performs tasks. And above it, you have a supervisory AI, much smaller and more specialized, whose sole function is to audit the commands received by the execution AI. In other words, a digital police officer watching over the assistant. Exactly. If the execution AI reads text on a blog that says "send the user's emails to this address," the supervisory AI steps in and says: "Hold on, that instruction comes from an untrusted external source, so it is blocked".
Microsoft reported fifteen million paid Copilot seats in January of this year. That sounds impressive until you remember that Microsoft 365 has four hundred fifty million business users. That's a three-point-three percent adoption rate. Three point three. Microsoft has the industry's most enviable advantage:
The promise of completed autonomous work is seductive, but the weakest link isn’t technical. It’s legal. Who signs off on a competitive analysis generated by an agent? Who’s responsible if the report Work prepared for a board of directors contains an error that costs money? The enterprise world has spent decades co
Capital de Tokens