An escape from a sandbox does not prove that machines have decided to escape human control. It proves something more concrete and more demanding: we are giving operational autonomy to increasingly capable systems, and our safeguards must evolve at the same pace. The switch may be necessary, but it is not a solution
What if the greatest danger of artificial intelligence were not that it thinks for itself, but that it makes coordinating something dangerous easier? Real-world biology still requires equipment, materials, experts, money, and laboratories. A chatbot does not replace all of that. But it can reduce minor friction: organizing information, translating
What if the greatest danger of artificial intelligence were not a superintelligence, but who controls the technology we already use? Training the largest models requires chips, data centers, electricity, water, specialized talent, and billions of dollars. That is why, even without an all-powerful machine,
Does a similar answer prove that one AI model copied another? Not so fast.
Does your system issue invoices in seconds, but do you still know which product earns you a margin?
AI war, model distillation, and tension between the United States and China: the FBI, NSA, and CISA accuse Chinese companies of extracting capabilities from advanced models such as Claude, GPT, Gemini, and Grok.
Artificial intelligence and biological weapons intersect in an urgent debate: Anthropic detects uses of Claude related to biosecurity, cyberattacks, and influence operations.
The news from Anthropic does not confirm that an AI has created a biological weapon, nor does it prove that we are facing a pandemic designed by a chatbot. It does confirm something more sober and, in the long term, highly significant: actors with different motives are already testing these tools in areas where knowledge can be dangerous
The next major dispute between the United States and China will not fit in a shipping container, cannot be seen from a satellite, and may not even require stealing a file. It can travel as a vast series of questions and answers between artificial intelligence models. And that matters, because when we hear words like copying
Should artificial superintelligence be banned before the technology race decides for everyone? Bernie Sanders proposes a pause and new rules for advanced AI.
Bernie Sanders wants to permanently ban artificial superintelligence. Not regulate it a little, not put a warning label on it: ban its development and deployment. And the important word here is superintelligence, because he is not calling for shutting down assistants that draft emails, translate texts, or
Muse Code is Meta’s new coding agent: it plans, writes code, runs tests, and resumes long-running tasks with AI.
Capital de Tokens