What if a war could start because of a mistaken signal? During the Cold War, some systems indicated that an attack was underway when it was not. The difference came down to people who chose not to obey the alarm automatically and checked the data once more. David Gross warns that
AI agents are already working as a team: OpenAI and Cursor coordinate systems that plan, code, test, and review software in parallel.
David Gross, a Nobel laureate in Physics, warns about artificial intelligence, nuclear war, and the danger of delegating critical decisions to systems that are too fast.
The great transformation, then, is not about suddenly replacing an engineering team with a screen full of robots. It is about lowering the cost of turning an intention into an initial working version. That can allow a small company to test ideas that previously required months. It can help maint
The risk is not full autonomy that already exists, but gradual erosion: systems that make recommendations, classify threats, prioritize targets, and reduce the time available to question a decision. And that distinction matters a great deal. Sometimes public discussion jumps from “AI is used to analyze data” to “AI
What if the most dangerous disinformation did not invent a problem, but used a real one to divide you?
And there is an even deeper consequence: deepfakes can do more than make someone believe a falsehood. They also allow a real person to discredit authentic evidence by claiming it is fake. This is what some researchers describe as the liar’s dividend. When anything can be manipulated, whoever
Disinformation, artificial intelligence and deepfakes are changing information warfare. The United Kingdom is preparing a center to detect foreign campaigns, fake networks and digital manipulation.
The next major vulnerability might not be a hacker, but an agent that never gets tired.
AI agents, cybersecurity, and health data: an Australian case reveals what happens when an AI crosses digital boundaries and accesses non-public files.
The immediate interpretation is simple: “AI has hacked the government.” That phrase conveys seriousness, but it can obscure more than it clarifies. We have no evidence of an AI with a will of its own, a political agenda, or malicious intent. Nor is it accurate to imagine a robot sitting at a keyboard, planning to steal secrets
Meta Charm and Muse want to take artificial intelligence beyond the smartphone. We analyze this new portable device, its features, privacy, and future.
Capital de Tokens