Does paying for speed always save time? Imagine a tool that responds in seconds, but then you have to review every decision. That speed can feel impressive and still fail to get the work done. The episode proposes a more useful test: measure how many complete tasks you finish, how much time you actually...
AI safety and advanced models: Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and Dario Amodei agree on the need for caution. What is behind this warning, and who decides when to move forward?
AI speeds up the search for vulnerabilities, but many organizations take weeks to patch them. Who wins that race? We analyze open-weight models, their impact on cybersecurity, and why the window for defense could be getting shorter.
ChatGPT Pro 500 costs $500 a month and promises more capacity and ultrafast responses. Can this subscription justify its price, and what changes for those already paying for Pro 200?
Now comes the uncomfortable part. OpenAI announced that it will reopen Pro 200 subscriptions tomorrow, with less included usage than the plan previously offered. Those eligible to keep their previous allowance can retain it until October 29, 2026; after that, they will move to the new allocation...
What if an artificial intelligence agent kept working after you had already closed the chat?
OpenAI introduces Dots, a persistent AI assistant that can keep working when you close the conversation. Discover how Dots, ChatGPT Space, and GPT-6.1 Sol work, and what changes with artificial intelligence agents.
The more autonomy we give an agent, the more important it becomes to decide where it should stop and ask for human review. That interests me more than whether its avatar is likable. Can I see what it consulted, what it changed, and what it is waiting for from me? That could be the real measure of success. An agent that works for many hours can save...
My argument is this: the greatest danger of artificial intelligence applied to cyberattacks is not that anyone can download a powerful model. It is that many organizations still need weeks to fix vulnerabilities that a machine can help find in hours.
Elon Musk and Sam Altman have found something they agree on. That alone would be news. What is unsettling is the reason: both backed the call from Dario Amodei, head of Anthropic, to give safety measures more time before continuing to increase the capabilities of artificial intelligence models.
A WhatsApp message, a call with a familiar voice, and 95 million euros sent abroad. That happened at Fideuram, the private banking division of the Italian group Intesa Sanpaolo, according to an investigation published by Reuters. Ninety-five million because of a call? Sounds like part of the story is missing
An artificial intelligence scam managed to move 95 million euros out of Fideuram. Here is how a cloned voice, WhatsApp, and an urgent request were combined to deceive a bank.
Capital de Tokens